|
Guidelines on Childrens' Clothes with Pictures and Dolls
A Fatwa by Shaykh Muhammad Naasir-ud-Deen Al-Albaanee
WWW.MUTTAQUN.COM
Taken from the cassette entitled: Tawjeehaat Lil-Mar’atil-Muslimah (Guidelines for the Muslim woman) of Shaykh Muhammad Naasir-ud-Deen Al-Albaanee (may Allah have mercy on him) By Shaykh Muhammad Naasir-ud-Deen Al-Albaanee Translated by Abu Yusuf, Sagheer Ibn ‘Abdir-Rasheed Al-Kashmeeree
Shaykh Muhammad Naasir-ud-Deen Al-Albaanee (may Allah have mercy on him) was asked the following question:
Question:
- Here, one of the sisters asks: What is the ruling on clothing
children with clothes, which contains pictures of things which have
souls if it is not possible to erase these pictures from them, because
by erasing them (the pictures), the garment is spoiled?
So, the Shaykh replied: Answer:
- Without doubt, it has to be said, that for the likes of this
question, the purchasing of the garment which is illustrated with
pictures, has to have definitely already occurred by mistake or
negligence from the father or mother who bought (it), because the
fundamental principle is that it is not appropriate for the Muslims
that they purchase clothes which have pictures on them. However, a
person may be unaware, and he may be negligent, and they may forget…and
he may forget and he may purchase a garment, (and) after he returns
with it to his house it becomes clear to him that there is a full
prohibited picture on it. So, in this situation also, this question
(above) is not to be found. It is imperative that another introduction
precede it (this question), and it is…the changing of the garment for
another garment from the place where it was purchased from, (whereby
this new garment) does not have on it a prohibited picture. So if… so
if it was not possible for the father or the mother to change it (for
another garment), then here in the third stage (of this situation) this
question comes about.
So, I remind about these two
introductions (which should be placed before the question) because the
majority of the people are heedless when they proceed to the markets.
They buy everyday necess ities (which are made) from different
materials, from them which are the likes of those things which are
spread out (carpets, rugs, mats etc.) and blankets or what resembles
that, those (things) which are predominantly illustrated with pictures
and decorated. And they do not pay any attention to them at all (these
materials which have pictures) and they buy them with the excuse that
these materials are not respected (because they are sat on, slept on
etc.) and are not hung up.
So, we say: It is imperative
upon the Muslims that they be those who are awake (and) not those who
are asleep, and that they pay attention to the plot of the
disbelievers, those who are invading them in the midst of their own
house with diverse ways – and that which is from them (these ways) are
these clothes which are illustrated with pictures. And
it (this matter) is mentioned bit by bit, specifically if the people
are in need of it. And in a manner more specific when they are made
heedless through some of the erroneous guidelines, through some of the
fataawa (religious edicts) which are not based upon authentic proof,
like (the fataawa for) these dolls and children’s toys which cram
up the markets and the mothers go and buy for the boys and girls many a
thing from these amusements in the name of them (being) toys for
children or toys for girls.
So, it is imperative that we
remember something here, and it is that the toys (i.e. dolls) which are
allowed to be used for the small children… rather I say for girls only
and not for the males from the children, that there is not out there
any proof for the permissibility (of these toys/dolls) except the
hadeeth of ‘Aaishah (radiallahu ‘anhaa) which says that she used to
send for the daughters from the daughters of her neighbours to come to
her and she would play with them with girls’ toys and the Messenger (
Sallallaahu ‘alaihi wa ‘ala aalihi wa sallam ) would help her in that
and consent to her (doing that) and he would not rebuke her. Rather,
indeed he (Sallallaahu ‘alaihi wa ‘ala aalihi wa sallam) [entered upon
her] one time and saw amongst her toys a horse with two wings. So he (‘
alaihi salaam) said to ‘Aaishah, playing about with her: ‘A horse which
has two wings?!’ She said: ‘O’ Messenger of Allah, have you not
heard’ or ‘has it not reached you that the horse of Sulaymaan
(‘alaihi salaam) had wings?’ and he (‘alaihi salaatu wa salaam) laughed
and he affirmed her in that. This hadeeth is the proof which makes it
possible for us to rely upon it in allowing girl’s toys (i.e. dolls)
with images and sculptured forms.
However, there is a
principle of Fiqh (jurisprudence) out there that every text which
comes and carries within its folds a ruling which is an exception from
the general proofs, then this ruling is halted at and it is not
increased upon because it is against the fundamental principle. And
that which was like that, i.e. that which was against the fundamental
principle, then an analogy ( qiyaas) is not made from that which was
irregular to the fundamental principle, (and) because that which was
against (an) analogy (being made with it), cannot (then) be used
to make (a further) analogy based upon it, and indeed it is but
connected (back) to the general principle. If
this meaning is clear to all, inshaa’Allah, then at this time we
say: The toys which Sayyidah ‘Aaishah ( radiallahu ‘anhaa) [had], they
were from that type which some of the other women engaged in, in
diverting the attention of their children away from requesting food and
drink in the state of them fasting. And indeed they (the women) used to
take for them images from coloured wool, from cotton and give them to
those who were fasting from the youngsters, diverting their attention
away from requesting food and drink. This type from the images, this
type from the toys of the children, it was a local (type of image and
toy) and it was a domestic [i.e. in the house] (type of image and toy),
and it was not imported from outside the Islamic households, let alone
being imported from the lands of disbelief and misguidance which
manufacture toys and figures which are in accordance with their tastes,
with their habits and their customs, and which do not agree in any way
whatsoever with the habits of the Muslims and their customs and the
rulings of their Sharee’ah.
And from that which shows you
this, is what you see in these (imported) images, from the (imported)
figures (which) sometimes are small (in size) and sometimes are big (in
size), until (even) a young girl (who) can just about hold the doll and
(yet) it is the same length as her and the same width as her and it has
blond hair and clipped (in its hair) from the sides like the male
children. And it (the imported doll) has a garment which are shorts
i.e. the garment which has no legs to it, and it has the short garment
which reveals the thighs (of the dolls). These sculptured forms contain
the customs of those disbelievers and their habits and their
mannerisms.
So, if we entered these sculptured forms
into our houses, then first that (shows) that we are pleased with what
they contain (i.e. from the customs, habits and mannerisms of those who
made them)…firstly…, and secondly, that we are teaching our children
(those) mannerisms and that we are bringing them up since their tender
age upon finding pleasant these objects which are mutually
contradictory to the Islamic clothing, and in particular that which is
related to the men. And due to this, it is imperative upon us to beware
of these imported clothes from the lands of disbelief with their
[different] types and their (different) forms and their (different)
purposes, and from that are the clothes of young children.
So
we, with great sorrow, every time we enter a house we find the children
of our brothers, those who adhere - according to our claim - to
the Book of our Lord and the Sunnah of our Prophet, despite all of
that, we find that the children have been dressed in clothes which have
pictures on them and lewd pictures. Then, this calamity has spread
until we have begun to clothe our youths who have passed the age of
responsibility with shirts which have pictures on the back and on the
front.
And (when) sometimes we pray the Jum’ah prayer,
there comes to the Jum’ah prayer, as you know, the one who does
not pray except on the day of Jum’ah, and most of his life he
spends in play a nd amusement and despite that he (stills) attends
the Jum’ah prayer. So, we see him praying and behind him i.e. on
the back of his shirt, there is a picture of a woman with her hair
flowing and visible from her is her arm and her neck and the likes of
that, and we face this picture.
These strange acts of
heedlessness from the Muslims, I think that that which helps in
spreading these shameful things and these Islamic violations is the
saying that the prohibited images are indeed only but firstly, the
three-dimensional images which have a shadow. As for that which is not
three-dimensional, then these they claim are permissible and allowed
and especially if they were not formed by the hand but were rather but
formed with a photo camera or a printer. So, these are from the
whisperings of shaytaan which he has thrown amongst humanity in this
time and beautified for them (the fact) that there is nothing wrong
with them. So, it is upon the Muslims therefore,
to stay away from buying any type from the types of clothes which have
these pictures on them due to what we have mentioned earlier.
And
in conclusion I say in response to that question (asked above): If the
affair revolves around scraping off (the picture from) the garment and
wasting the benefit from it and around seeking pleasure from it (the
garment) despite its obvious and hidden shortcomings…I say if…., then
seeking benefit (from it) is permissible. However, I believe that the
believing woman and the one who with her capability is truly the
mistress of the house, (should) erase the traces of that picture by
scraping (it) off and with embroidery whereby the head is wiped out
because the affair is as he (‘alaihi as salaam) said: ‘Indeed, the
picture is but the head’.
So, if the head is wiped out, the
picture is wiped out, even if some of its traces remain. And with this
has the answer been completed inshaa’Allah.
Related Articles: Pictures | Tasweer
Related Book:
| "The Islamic Ruling concerning Tasweer" -
Learn the ruling on Two & Three Dimensional Images, Drawings,
Paintings, Photography and Sculptures. One of the most in-depth English
translations which deals with this topic. It is a large compilation of various
opposing views from prominent Sheikhs, presenting their Quran and Sunnah
proofs for your determination in understanding this serious matter.
|
Action Items for the
uttaqun:
- Remember that the toys and dolls you choose for your children are teaching values.
- Deface your dolls
- Remember
that the dolls that 'Aisha (r.a.) and others at that time had, were
simple and not meant to imitate the precision of a real child, as some
of today's plastic molded dolls with many elaborate details.
- Do
not allow your children to wear clothes, shoes, carry backpacks, etc.,
with a picture of anything with a soul. Take a marker and cross out the
head and any inappropriately exposed body parts, such as knees for a
boy, etc. Or scratch it out with scissors or pocket-knife, etc.
- Teach children the proofs from the sunnah for this position.
- Teach
children the harms of images, such as leading the disbelievers astray,
leading to worship of these figures, and trying to create what only
Allah subhana wa ta'ala can create.
- Do
not let toys or clothes with haram images to enter the masjid. Do the
best not to bring anything that could be classified as a "doubtful
matter" into the masjid, either. Let's give our best when at the
masjid, the house of Allah.
Remember... Allah, subhana watala,
sees everything we do!

|
|
|
|